Sottile '64 / My Dartmouth / Mascot

Scratch Pad

HOME
"My Dartmouth" Mascot Forward & Overview
Dartmouth Since The Indian
Reindeer and Caribou ---> Only Decision
Mascot D(ecision)-Day For Big D
Getting On Down To The Mascot Business
ANTLERS TO ANTLERS From History to the Future Lord Dartmouth's Antlered Coat of Arms
Antlers
Reindeer Centerfolds
Getting To Reindeer / Caribou
Reindeer / Caribou at the Combines
Reindeer vs Moose -- Winner Is Reindeer / Caribou
Reindeer & Dartmouth Past & Present Academics EXCELLENT NEWS
Reindeer & Dartmouth Winter Carnival
Reindeer On Mainstreet Mean Refined Antlers & A New Hanover Chic
Reindeer On Mainstreet Mean Adult & Kid Fashions A New Hanover Look
Reindeer @ Dartmouth Rudolph Is Separate
Reindeer & Secular Santa Not Religion
Dartmouth & Indians
Dartmouth's Official Unofficial Snivelling
AN EXTERNAL LINK TO JohnDavidSottile SiteMap

"MY DARTMOUTH"
 
Dartmouth Since The Indian Symbol
A College Community Searching For A Culture
 
The decision to drop the Indian imagery is of no issue to me or this effort.
 
It's over. It's done. 
 
 Nonetheless, I believe that The College dismisses the loss of the symbol
without understanding that for 50 or more classes durings its use
the symbol was more than an icon; it was a culture
respectfully woven into ceremonies
which The College adopted and
made official via the concept
of implied consent.
 
For some families,
that's three generations of graduates!
 
Everyone knows that corporate culture emanates from the head-shed.
And the shed on College Row has failed to restructure a new culture
throughout numerous Presidential & Trustee regimes.
 
How can I be certain of my statement?
 
Simply by observation...  There are legions of students, alums, and others
still searching for not only a mascot, but a tangible culture, not just a color.
 
To me, it's strange for The College to be sensitive to one culture,
while not having enough empathy and courage to reconstruct
the culture which was expunged by its first decision,
regardless of that decision's noble merits.
 
The responsibility and obligation to reconstruct this college culture
rest soley with The College;  after all, it co-opted the moniker
of regional sportswriters to "trademark" Dartmouth
and its now lost -- banned -- culture.
 
CULTURE 
 
Was it not The College's honoring culture which was the essence
of the renewed emphasis on Native American Studies?
Did it not then seem logical that determining and
nurturing a new overall Dartmouth community
culture to be as important? 
 
Apparently Not!
 
Regrettably, ironically, and other appropriate adverbs,
it has not been important enough for The College
to do so during the past 30 years.

After 30 Years of Mascot Indecisions,
You Just Know What Even "The Donald" Would Say!"

 
No, not those two now famous words...
 
these three...
 
"You Must Decide"
 
We all know that there are but four functions to management... plan, organize, direct, and control... with decisions being required in each. Specific to the adoption of a new mascot, The College has failed to manage and decide, which is solely its responsiblity.
 
The effect of this indecision has been all negative! Confused and alientated alums... frustrated students expending energies in blogs, discussion, efforts, etc., and I believe a bruised eye for the numerous administrations that have punted on this decision.
 
It's amazing to watch The College, committed to developing individuals and prominent leaders, fail to lead by example!  Moreover, it's absolutely befuddling to see Tuck currently offering a 2 day, $2,800 seminar on "Branding" this while the mascot, culture, college colors, and uniforms are uncoordinated.  Where's the campus credibility?
 
Dazed 'n Amazed... Confused 'n Contused!
 
The College has missed the obvious: THE STUDENTS AND ALUMS NEED ... YES NEED... A MASCOT.  They must!  Thirty years have not attenuated their drive to find one... nor will and another thirty years, even though by then all the alums who knew the old symbol and culture will be dead. 
 
Excepting the ever-fewer-"Reviewers," the issue at this point isn't about replacing the Indian symbol, it's about making the student and alumni bodies whole.
 
In the United States... teams and schools need mascots, symbols, and resulting cultures.  That's just the way it is!  Frivolous perhaps... nonetheless mascots are apparently "must have," not a "nice to have."  People, more educated than I, can debate the origins of this inner American need; who knows, perhaps it would be a great future course on campus.  
 
But for now, it's time to end the discussion...
It's time FOR THE COLLEGE to decide...
( Let's do it, or not do it for X years, or forever) 
And, it's time to move on!
 
Post WWII Europe and Japan were totally rebuilt far sooner than the 30 years that have past since Dartmouth stripped itself of the Indian symbol... Moreover, the Korean and Vietnam Wars raged during this same time duration.  Gosh!  In ONE THIRD this time, our country went from failed missle launches to two men on the moon.  And consider this:  Within this time,The U.S. normalized relationships with North Vietnam, the once-enemy that killed classmates and contemporaries.
 
Thirty plus years is not a blink in history...
It's a lifetime... and for some, an eternity.
 
I'll give that it's inappropriate, but "Jeez-zus Key-rist!" is a least an accurate expletive to vent the frustration over 30-32 years of mascot indecisions.  For regardless of your faith, there is little doubt that a guy named Jesus was born and crucified in about this same time-span for whom there is now a worldwide belief.  It's a humbling thought to be considered as The College stumbles over a mascot!    
 
Here's another... 30 years x 1,000 students/class = 30,000 alumni, ranging in age from 54 years and younger, would now either be content with, or at least accustomed to a post Indian TRADITION & CULTURE.  As a percentage of all living alumni, this is huge.
 
Regarding the mascot, there have many "voices crying in the wilderness," but there's also been The College with an unstructured decision process (a deafness of sorts) to interpret these cries.
 
In College news article after article, the oneness that is striking is how this-or-that alum / student / or group PRESENTED TO THE COLLEGE. 
 
Clearly, this is a reversal of stewardship
that provides strategy and governance.
 
Could it be that the College really doesn't wants to make this decision?
 
Could it also be that The College's overall decision is an "unofficial" no decision until all old alums die off and/or something spontaneous happens --- you know, just the last time... when sports reporters coined a moniker that stuck.
 
It takes more than footballs and sports writers to make a decision. It requires "Puck" and a lot of courage.  In every college where there has been a mascot change, there has been student and alumni unrest, with even some mega-donors extorting the college through threats to withhold support for athletic facilities. (Any college that folds to this pressure isn't worthy of instructing youth.)  One may read of this in the links.
 
There's no questioning that mascot change is in a hard-ball, fast-pitch league.  The only question is who's stepping up to the plate to meet the blistering challenge when the ump barks, "Batter-Up!"? The College... or self-designated hitters of which I'm one.
 
As a living experience, Dartmouth's indecision proves indeed that "Nature really does abhor a vaccuum," which is exactly what the College has allowed to exist with its unstructured decision process.  
 
Perhaps started as a spoof, the fun-loving, irrepressible "KEGGY" is an object which human-Nature found that fills that vaccuum . Is Keggy a slap in the face to The College, which has sought to de-emphasis a drinking image? If it's not, it should at least a slap across the face, alerting The College that it is time to decide... or expect more KEGGY's, mascots du jour, and unfavorable press.
 
 
So... let's bang clean the cleats and dig in for a home run, touchdown, hole-in-one.
 
I encourage all to read on.  Answers to unresolved problems follow in this one
site, with supporting links to satisfy most all questions.

Not Unique... Not Official... Notwithstanding
 
 
FROM THE BEGINNING...
 
We're all familiar with memos like the one below.  It's the contrivance of an honest idea, "spun 'n scrubbed" by pr and legal, respectively, which becomes a slick document more notable for what it appears to say, than says.  More than the denial of the word "official," it was this last paragraph, just below, that ignited my Mascot Mission!

 
 

 
 
"During the past 25 years, various student initiatives have proposed numerous candidates for a tangible mascot, symbol or nickname that could be a companion or alternative to "Big Green" when identifying Dartmouth athletic teams. To date, none of these recommendations has received sufficient broad-based support from students or alumni to merit adoption."
 

 

I believe that it's outrageous for The College to literally blame any group or entity, but itself, for the absence of a replacement mascot, symbol, and culture.  And, rather than just accepting its responsibility and failure, The College is even willing to take-on a submissive, "other-directed" posture.  Big Green becomes Victim Green.  Victim Green means Little Green.  It's a sorry -- even pathetic -- stature to assume for one of America's top ten colleges.  Dartmouth Franchisees, on this matter, you can -- and should -- leave home without your Franchise Card.  
 
My purpose in attacking the below document is to facilitate a new campus mascot and culture.  Perhaps, some truth will set everyone free, especially people holding onto an Indian past, which was more hype than substance. 
 
1.  Recognizing that many older alumni are unaware of this document and of the comparatively short reign of the Dartmouth Indian, I believe that it's necessary to illustrate how un-unique Dartmouth was in its Indian education.  Other prestigious private colleges, especially Harvard, could have (and still can) claimed and conjured and Native American tradition as strong if not stronger than Dartmouth's. 
 
2.  Recognizing that The College confesses to looking to alumni / students for its new mascot, I believe that it's appropriate to challenge The College that since IT was responsible for promulgating the Indian brand... IT therefore is responsible for leading the final constructive effort to select a replacement.  The College has been remiss in fulfilling this NEED of its people, who attend and support it. 
 
3.  Recognizing that there have been many administrations and people who have passed through Dartmouth since 1972, I have NO ONE PERSON in mind when I mention "The College."  How could I?  I KNOW NO ONE... and know nothing of internal efforts to address the mascot issue.
 
I KNOW BUT ONE THING... 
 
It's 30 years since the Indian tradition ended, and The College still doesn't have a new one.  This is squarely The College's fault; external efforts have been made to secure one.
 
 
 

The Dartmouth Indian
Release:  Dartmouth College Public Affairs

The first Dartmouth College intercollegiate athletic contest, a baseball game, was played in 1866. At that time, green was adopted by the students as the college color. Green has been associated with the College and its athletic teams ever since.

Starting in the 1920s sportswriters (primarily representing Boston's many newspapers of the day) began to regularly use the nickname "Indians" in their coverage of Dartmouth's football team as it achieved a position of national prominence. The usage was grounded in reference to the College's founding mission in 1769 - the education of American Indian youth (known today as Native Americans) in the region.

For about 50 years thereafter, the nickname "Indians," though never officially adopted by the College, was used actively and interchangeably with "the Green," "Big Green" and "Hanoverians" by the news media and in Dartmouth publications in coverage of the College's teams. The Indian symbol also appeared on uniforms of athletic teams during this period.

In 1972, Dartmouth renewed its commitment to the education of Native Americans. Recognizing the adverse effects of use of the Indian symbol upon the College's Native American Program and its students, an ad hoc committee of the Dartmouth Alumni Council encouraged reduction in use of the symbol. In 1974, the College's Board of Trustees stated that "use of the (Indian) symbol in any form to be inconsistent with present institutional and academic objectives of the College in advancing Native American education."

By the mid-1970s the Indian symbol, which had never been formally adopted by a College governing body, was discontinued.

Since that time, the primary nickname for Dartmouth teams, again never officially adopted, has been the "Big Green." PMS 349, a dark green referred to frequently in relation to the College as "Dartmouth Green," is the specific color used in publications relating to Dartmouth athletic teams and in other College publications.

During the past 25 years, various student initiatives have proposed numerous candidates for a tangible mascot, symbol or nickname that could be a companion or alternative to "Big Green" when identifying Dartmouth athletic teams. To date, none of these recommendations has received sufficient broad-based support from students or alumni to merit adoption.

^ END OF COLLEGE TEXT ^

MY COMMENTS FOLLOW

"Unofficial!"
Who's Zooming Whom?

mydartmouthindiansymbols75.jpg

CLOCKWISE FROM UPPER LEFT
ROTC, BAND, COLLEGE

IMPLIED CONSENT

Though Dartmouth's Indian Era is over, it insults one's intelligence to have The College attempt hiding behind its nuanced ("unofficial" vs "official") existence.

From the above statement, The College IMPLIES that it never OFFICIALLY convened a meeting and OFFICIALLY voted on the use of the Indian symbol.

As a factual statement, let's accept that the above is correct.

Nonetheless, budgets were OFFICIALLY APPROVED by duly AUTHORIZED PEOPLE (some would call them "officials") of The College corporation.  And, when uniforms with the Indian symbols that OFFICIALLY REPRESENTED The College in sport or whatever were purchased via College authorizations, the words "unoffical" and "official" became indistinguishable.

Make no mistake... the Indian image, symbol, symbolisms, and traditions (collectively "branding") WERE adopted by The College each time they were used at a College event,through the LEGAL CONCEPT OF IMPLIED CONSENT, which disallows an entity the ability to escape an obligation blessed through "a wink 'n a nod," or silence.

From the Law Dictionary" 2nd Ed.  by Steven H. Gifis (then Associate Professor Law at Rutgers) Published by Barron's Educational Seriees, Inc.

IMPLIED CONSENT... consent... "manifested by signs, actions, or facts, or by inaction or silence, which raises a presumption that consent has been given," 487 S.W. 2d 624, 629; or consent that arises from a course of conduct or relationship between the parties, in which there is mutual acquiescence or a lack of objection under circumstances signifying assent. 195 S.E. 2d 711, 713...

The College always had the right to stop "the press" from its using "Indians" to describe a team, or The College. It didn't excercise its right; it "officially" remained silent for 50 years.

*****
 
A PROBLEM IN FACT: It's the responsibility of a company or college to protect its trademarks and names. It's also its responsibility to protect against false respresentations. Therefore, Dartmouth must work to perfect its own image. Regarding a mascot or symbol, it can best do this pro-actively with a new, OFFICIALLY ANNOUNCED REPLACEMENT.   Otherwise, it will have to do so reactively through cease and desist letters to scrub clean its past image. EXAMPLE:  Now that the below link is known, it is the responsibility of The College to challenge the publisher for alteration, otherwise it could be argued that it consents to its existence.
 

 

"MY  DARTMOUTH"
READ ALL ABOUT IT

Which Way Did They Go?
We must find them... We are their leaders!
 
<<  >>
 
The Big Green College fingers "the press" for Indian image...
Claims that it never officially adopted any symbol or logo.
 
Today, chaos still reigns after 30 years.
D-students adopt ad-hoc mascots of all sorts.
Without a symbol The College looses big $$$
in licensed products.
 
It should have been a Tuck biz-case 30 years ago!
 
( Ironically, Tuck is hosting a seminar on BRANDING in October 2004.
What's its credibility when The College's own image is 30 years in flux?  ) 
 
*****
For approximately 50 years, representing 25% of the College's history up to 1972,
the year when the College re-awakened its passion for Indian education, 
an innocent  fraud of sorts was created on the students and alumni.
The College overtly approved and co-opted the Indian moniker,
which was created by "the press," and transformed it into
emblems on sports uniforms and College lore.
In 1974, The College banned all use and
references to the Indian symbol.
leaving many alumni bruised. 
Today, The College sits
paralyzed on this
sore wound.
 
*****
Historically, Dartmouth's "Indian Era" was brief.
"Officially," says The College, "it never existed."
But, for about 50 classes... they know that it did!
 
Still, it's time for a make-over.

Ol' Eleazar was not alone in his quest to educate Indians.
John Harvard beat him by whole 119 years!
As for Eleazar, he was from Yale!

"Given the highly charged religious atmosphere, it is not surprising that in 1754 Eleazar Wheelock, another Yale-educated minister, founded Moor's Indian Charity School in Lebanon, Connecticut. Wheelock was impressed by the promise of his Indian students (among whom was the future Mohawk leader Joseph Brant), but especially by a Mohegan convert, Samson Occom, whom he had tutored privately from 1743 to 1747. With Occom's help he secured funds from England that allowed him in 1769 to found Dartmouth College, originally intended as a school for Indian youths."

*****

READ ALL ABOUT IT...

Eastern Universities and IndiansDartmouth was hardly unique, but chose to "trademark" itself through an Indian image once given the concept by sportswriters. Put thusly, this either sounds like a self-directed, "official" move,  or an other-directed, lame acceptance. 

BY CLICKING LINKS, YOU'LL OPEN A BROSWER TO ANOTHER SITE.

TIMELINE AS ILLUSTRATED IN
AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND CATALOG

dartmouthmascothardvarddartmouth0x75x560.jpg

dartmouthmascotharvarddartmouthschoolsx200x560a.jpg

dartmouthmascotharvarddartmouth1x600x560a.jpg

BUT, IN THE END...
ALL IS WELL AND GETTING BETTER

dartmouthmascotbetrayalsamoccumx75x130.jpg

FROM THE
NOVEMBER 1998 
 
DARTMOUTH
Alumni Magazine
 
"And the legacy of Occom's vision of Indian education remains.  The founding of Dartmouth College -- like Samson Occom's life -- was braided with strands of promise and betrayal.  The College took 200 years to rededicate itself to Indian education.  Introduced in 1972, Dartmouth's Native American Studies program has grown into a full-scale department and now offers a major.  Some hundred Native Americans currently study at the College, among them Occom descendant Sarah Harris '00."
 
"Occum's name still appears to be good for credit in the Dartmouth community, too.  The Samson Occom Pooled Income Fund has netted five million dollars in donations from Dartmouth alumni.  The College, though, owes more than a financial debt of gratitude to Samson Occom.  For had Samson Occom not found Eleazar Wheelock, there would have been no Dartmouth."
 
BERND PEYER, a lecturer at the Zentrum fur Nordamerika-Forshung in Frankfurt, Germany, taught Native American Studies at Dartmouth in 1995.

 
 

 
 

 

 
 

 

 
 

 
 

 

 

 
 

 
 

 

 

 

 
I don't know what has been tried by Dartmouth... or what groups have tried it.  I gather that there has been work on the "D." "The Big Green" has been adopted by the Trustees... the moose of course... a failed attempted at Dr Seuss... and some other creatures, I'm certain.
 
Coinsider this!  Within just my graduating class and one year around it, ('63 '65) there are such powerful guys who have turned huge corporations around financially, defended them in the highest courts, and otherwise had trememdous careers.  These are guys who make mountains move; many are admirably very, very, loyal Sons of Dartmouth.  Their names are on walls and on buildings.  Yet despite their inputs and efforts, The College remains without a mascot. 
 
It seems certain where the roadblock lies.
 
*************************
I also don't know to what extent the school wants to be distinctive.  For example, I'm certain that someone at The Hop Center could craft a unique "D"... and I know people that could create an entire, copyright-able/trademarkable "Dartmouth" font which could be used for all lettering.  How cool would that be!  Either this isn't a cool idea or it is judged coolly by people who... well let's just say aren't hot on the idea. 
 
So for know... I'm thinking about a letter "D"... and perhaps an entire font...  To this, I add THE CORRECT DARTMOUTH GREEN which also could be a unique PMS (add some black etc) that could then be licensed or restricted.  Then I thinking about whether there should be an accent color.
 
I'm not certain whether "white" was ever a color that Dartmouth "officially" adopted other than the way some people use American bread (it has no taste) to hold a sandwich together.  After all, the schools doesn't refer to itself as The Big White when it travels wearing its all white uniforms.
 
I could also be great to add an accent color!  Whatever the color, it adds a fashion dimension (read more revenue) where the accent could also become the primary in off campus fashion... with the primary as accents. For example, every gal has something purple... And guys dig the color, too.
 
Then I'm thinking about the shield and saying of which there are three operative words "Voice"  "Crying-out" and "Wilderness" (three abstracts) of which the Connecticut River/Valley is a part... as are the winds (another abstract) that rush down it from Quebec Province where the river starts, if I recall.
 
Then of course this is all wrapped in "hallowed" Ivy League, which conjures antiquity, but really only goes back to the 50's as a formal structure.  Nonetheless, the tradition of hallowed halls can't be dismissed with any old eastern private colleges.
 
Then of course, there is the "creature" that personifies and  incorporates all the above.  Through a sane process of elimination for gender (moose/lion/etc out),
for commonality, etc.,  we get to a list of suspects from which some will be eliminated for not making the "menacing" nature realistic because they are too diminutive.  This eliminates "mice that roar" and other junk.  Yes, I have a link to listings with names such as "The Banana Slugs," but there is thankfully no such creatures on he Hanover Plain. 
 
Then one sets a date by which a DECISION is made... one that can be defended in a "pitch."  Ideally, if most objections are anticipated and whacked-out ideas eliminated... there should  emerge THE ONE OBVIOUS CHOICE! 
 
What follows are SUCH LOGICAL CHOICES.  But the goal is to get a Mascot and Symbol, not necessarily select my ideas...THOUGH I HAVE PRESENTED A COGENT CASE FOR THEIR ADOPTION.

 
 

REINDEER & HUMANS
 
Reindeer have been domesticated by humans
for the over last 5000 years.

Reindeer has come to be associated with the Christmas riding the tradition of the Santa Claus. As Santa is believed to have from the far away North, what else than a reindeer drawn sledge can serve as a better carriage?
>It is man's most ancient herd animal, the first animals being raised around 15,000 years ago. Up until about 12,000 years ago, reindeer grazed over a vast area of Europe. Rock paintings by primitive peoples featuring them are widespread, as are discoveries of tools made from reindeer horn. there was even a period of European prehistory in a part of France called Dordogne that is sometimes called "the civilization of reindeer." The only surviving part of such a civilization might be found in Lapland, which is the northern part of Norway, Sweden and Finland.

There are only a few thousand Lapps, but they own herds of many thousands of reindeer. From them the Lapps obtain meat, milk, hair for weaving, hides to make tents and clothing, and horn, from which they make households. They are also used to pull heavily laden sleds. It is all these multiple uses that have made reindeer so endearing to people in the North.

Caribou, the name by which the Americans are more familiar with reindeer, comes from an Indian word.
 
**********************

Question: I was wondering if you could inform us on the historical relevance of reindeer and the holidays?  P. Agiaso, Fort Myers

Answer: As you probably know, reindeer do not exist in Florida.  The wild caribou and domestic reindeer are considered to be a single species throughout the world, but are called by different names in North America.  Long ago, about 5,000 years, people began to tame caribou creating the domesticated reindeer we know today.  At first, hunters used the reindeer on leashes to get closer to wild herds of caribou.  Later, reindeer were used to pull sleds and in some cultures they were saddled and ridden.  Eventually they became a dependable source of food, hides, and transport.

Reindeer are a deer of the subarctic and arctic regions of Europe and Asia.  The largest one reaches up to four feet at the shoulders and up to 250 pounds.  Each reindeer can pull up to twice its own weight, making it an ideal animal for pulling a sleigh weighed down with any load. The Santa Claus legend came about in 1823 from a publication called “A Visit from Saint Nicholas”. Santa’s reindeer are the only known flying reindeer in existence.  It is believed that they were given the power of flight by magic corn that was given to Kris Kringle by a great wizard. Through this magic corn, the reindeer’s strength is increased to three times, their stamina is increased infinitely, and their hoofs can use the air as if it were solid ground.  This means that the normal reindeer compliment of nine can pull a sleigh full of toys up to 13,500 pounds for an unlimited amount of time.

Unlike other common deer, both male and female reindeer bear antlers.  According to the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, both grow antlers in the summer each year.  Male reindeer drop their antlers at the beginning of winter, usually in late November to mid-December.  Female reindeer retain their antlers until after giving birth in the spring.  Therefore, according to every historical rendition depicting Santa’s reindeer, every single one of them, including Rudolf, had to be a girl.  Well, it is not impossible that a male reindeer could retain his antlers until December 24, but it is unusual.  Maybe Santa only chose unusual reindeer.  However, most of us know that females are better with directions. 

Speaking of unusual, Rudolf has not always been an essential part of Christmas.  Rudolf the Red-Nosed Reindeer came to life in 1939 as a promotional gimmick for Montgomery Ward department stores.  The company asked Robert L. May to come up with a story they could give away to shoppers in the form of a coloring book.  May’s brother-in-law wrote the song that was later recorded by Gene Autry in 1949.  The legend has been a hit ever since. 

Now back to the facts.  Reindeer have a brownish coat that is dark in the summer and light in the winter.  The long hairs under the neck, the fur above the hooves, and the fur around the tail are almost white.  Reindeer eat grasses, leaves, mosses, and lichens obtained by scraping away the snow.  The sheer numbers of caribou and reindeer have caused ecological concerns.  Essential lichens can be seriously overgrazed and other wild animals can then become displaced.  In addition, herds can threaten ground-nesting birds by trampling nests and eggs.  Most of the destruction comes from humans who herd reindeer degrading the tundra. Reindeer remain a profitable endeavor in many countries.

I hope you have gained some insight about reindeer and the legend of Santa’s reindeer.  Don’t expect to see a reindeer living in Florida, they only pass through once a year - if you know what I mean.
 
************************************************************
 
Rudolph a Girl? Analyzing a Reindeer Problem


A story circulating on the Internet this holiday season claims that the famous Rudolph may have been a girl.

Rudolph, the red-nosed reindeer, is the lead guy hauling the sleigh as Santa makes his annual one-night trip around the world.

As the much-emailed account goes, male reindeer generally shed their antlers long before December 25, whereas the females retain theirs until at least January. The reindeer are always depicted as having antlers, so Santa's outriders must all be females.

But is there a scientific basis to this theory?

A hard look at the evidence suggests that at least some of Santa's reindeer were females (the ones giving the directions, no doubt), some may have been young bulls, and some may have been neutered males. And Rudolph got to be the lead guy because he had a snout full of parasites.

Many questions remain; how is it that Santa chose reindeer to haul his sleigh? Why not horses? And who made Father Christmas fat? Inquiring minds want to know. >

Creating Legends and Traditions

Two children's books written in the early 1800s are credited with introducing the reindeer aspect to the Santa legend.

The first, The Children's Friend, published in 1821, contains an illustration depicting an elfin-sized Santa dressed in red in a tiny sleigh pulled by one reindeer. The scene shows him delivering books and toys to good children, and a birch rod to those that have been naughty, said Laura Wasowicz at the American Antiquarian Society. "The book is very rare," she said. "We might have the only copy."

But it wasn't until 1823, when Clement Clarke Moore first published The Night Before Christmas in an upstate New York newspaper, that the reindeer legend really took off. In Moore's classic poem Santa had eight reindeer and they didn't really fly.

"Every American knows this poem," said Stephen Nissenbaum, historian and author of The Battle for Christmas, which was a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize in 1996. "But the 1848 edition shows Santa and the reindeer as miniature—elfin—and not flying through the air; they only leap into the air to avoid an obstacle or to get on the rooftop from the ground."

Moore is also the one who named the reindeer, as "Santa whistled and shouted and called them by name: Now Dasher! Now Dancer! Now, Prancer and Vixen! On, Comet, on, Cupid! On Donder and Blitzen."

It's possible to envision males named Dasher, Prancer, and Blitzen. But Vixen? Even Dancer is questionable as a boy name. It may be that Moore, who after all created the eight reindeer, knew it was a co-ed bunch.

Santa and his reindeer didn't attain life-size proportions until illustrator Thomas Nast began to depict Santa as a fat, bearded fellow living in the North Pole for Christmas issues of Harper's magazine beginning in the 1860s. It was also Nast who created Santa's workshop and the list of children's names, marking whether they'd been naughty or nice. Today only the toy-shop workers are portrayed as elves.

Rudolph, the ninth reindeer, the one with the red and shiny nose, made his first appearance in an illustrated pamphlet written in 1939 for the Montgomery Ward Company as an in-store handout for children. Rudolph became part of the zeitgeist when Johnny Marks wrote the song Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer in 1949, and had the good luck to have it recorded by the very popular singing cowboy, Gene Autry.

Still, why reindeer?

"I have no idea," said Nissenbaum. "I suppose the connotation is that in the north they use reindeer. Reindeer at the time were starting to be depicted in children's primers, and were becoming vaguely familiar exotic creatures to people, much like King Kong in more recent times."

Rudolph and Friends in the Spotlight

The question of Rudolph and his ' gender is slightly tricky. Santa's reindeer are always portrayed as having antlers.

So far, no problem. Reindeer, both wild and semi-domesticated, are the only members of the deer family in which both sexes grow antlers. The question is when do they shed them?

"The largest bulls shed their antlers first, almost immediately after the rutting season ends in late October," said Pat Valkenburg, a wildlife biologist with the Alaska Department of Fish and Game. "The sparring between bulls during rutting season can be extremely violent. In herds with a lot of mature bulls, injuries from rutting can be the leading cause of death."

By the end of the rutting season, the bulls not only don't have antlers, they're so played out that the likelihood that they could haul the fat man and tons of toys around the world in one night is slim.

Young bulls and cows can keep their antlers sometimes through April, depending on the nutritional conditions, amount of daylight, and retention of testosterone.

The Sami people of Lapland, whose livelihood depends on their reindeer herds, frequently neuter their working reindeer, which would interrupt the cycle that causes males to shed their antlers.

The evidence therefore leads to the conclusion that Santa's reindeer are either females, young bulls, or neutered.

Then there's the question of what made Rudolph's nose red—other than the whim of a copywriter.

In his book The Physics of Christmas, Roger Highfield, science editor for the London-based Daily Telegraph, cites the research of Odd Halvorsen of the University of Oslo. Halvorsen pointed out in the journal Parasitology Today, that reindeer noses provide a welcoming environment for bugs, and suggested that the "celebrated discoloration" of Rudolph's nose is probably due to parasites.

Valkenburg offers an alternative conclusion.

"Rudolph is a mythical character," he laughed. "He can be anything he wants to be."

************************************************************

http://www.novareinna.com/festive/deer.htmlhttp://www.novareinna.com/festive/deer.html

The Reindeer

Reindeer are a species of deer located in the Arctic regions of the world. The largest Reindeer can reach up to four feet high at the shoulder and weigh as much as 250 pounds. It is believed that there are no longer any wild Reindeer, the entire species seeming to have been domesticated. Each Reindeer can pull up to twice its own weight, making it an ideal animal for pulling a sleigh loaded down with any amount of cargo. Reindeer were first domesticated approximately 2000 years ago and, in the Arctic Circle, the Lapps would herd them in much the same way as other nations herded cattle. Reindeer are well-adapted to living in cold regions and under rugged conditions, able to smell-out food even when it is buried under deep snow. Reindeer have large broad hooves which act like snowshoes to support them over snowy and boggy ground. These hooves emit a "clicking" sound as the animal walks, caused by a tendon in the foot rubbing against a bone. The coat of the Reindeer consists of thick fur and stiff hairs which protect them from the worst of the weather. A thick woolly undercoat keeps out the deep cold by trapping air near the skin. These thick coats are also waterproof and, during migration, Reindeer are able to cover vast distances, crossing both rivers and lakes, in search of favorable feedings grounds. The calves are born in early Summer and have the ability to run almost from the moment they are born...a necessary trait if they are going to keep up with their mothers. The antlers of a male Reindeer are larger than those of the female and are palmate at the top...akin to open hands. An antler span of four feet has been recorded.

The Reindeer driven by Santa Claus are the only known flying Reindeer in existence, believed to have been endowed with the power of flight by virtue of magic corn given to Kris Kringle by a great and wonderful wizard. Through this magic corn, the strength of the Reindeer is increased threefold, their stamina increased to infinity and their hooves can manipulate the air as though it were solid ground. Thus, a complement of nine Reindeer would be able to pull a sleigh brimming with 13,500 pounds of toys for an unlimited amount of time.

Rudolph, The Red-Nosed Reindeer

"Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer" is perhaps the most modern of all Christmas symbols and certainly the most familiar of Reindeer, even though he was not a member of Santa's original team. Created in 1939 by a 34-year old copywriter named Robert L. May, Rudolph was the product of a request made by May's employer, Montgomery Ward, which wanted a Christmas story it could use as a promotional tool for its chain of department stores. The Chicago-based company had been buying and distributing coloring books for children at Christmas for many years and the idea of creating a giveaway booklet of its own was perceived to be an excellent means of saving money. May, who had a penchant for writing children's stories and limericks, was called upon to create the booklet.

Originally in poetry form, May composed the tale about a misfit reindeer by drawing, in part, upon "The Ugly Duckling" concept and May's own childhood experience of being subjected to frequent taunting due to his small, slight stature and his tendency toward shyness. Thus, May settled upon the idea of an underdog who is ostracized by the rest of the reindeer community because of his physical abnormality...a glowing red nose. In search of an alliterative name for his misfit, May considered and rejected "Rollo" as being too cheerful and carefree. He also rejected "Reginald," feeling it to be too British in nature, before finally deciding upon "Rudolph."

The story was written as a series of rhyming couplets which May tested on his 4-year old daughter Barbara as he went along. Barbara was delighted with the story, but May's employer feared that a tale featuring a red nose...an image usually associated with drinking and drunkards...might prove unsuitable for a Christmas story. May responded by taking Denver Gillen, a friend from Montgomery Ward's art department, to the Lincoln Park Zoo in order that Gillen could sketch some deer. Gillen's illustrations of a red-nosed reindeer overcame the hesistancy of May's employer and the Rudolph story was approved. That first year (1939), Montgomery Ward distributed 2.4 million copies of May's booklet, and although the wartime paper shortage curtailed printing for the following several years, a grand total of 6 million copies had been given to children by the end of 1946.

The post-war demand for licensing the Rudolph character was enormous but, since May had created the tale as an employee of Montgomery Ward, the company had possession of the copyright and May received no royalties. Deeply in debt due to the medical bills resulting from his wife's terminal illness (she passed away around the time Rudolph was created), May persuaded his employer's Corporate President, Sewell Avery, to turn over the copyright to him in January of 1947. With the rights to his creation in hand, May's financial security was assured.

Later that year, "Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer" was printed commercially and, in 1948, was shown in theaters as a 9-minute cartoon. The Rudolph phenomenon really caught on, however, when Johnny Marks, May's brother-in-law and songwriter, penned the lyrics and melody for a Rudolph song. This musical version of Rudolph's tale was recorded by Gene Autry in 1949. It sold two million copies during its first year and went on to become one of the best-selling songs of all time...second only to "White Christmas." In 1964, an American television special about Rudolph, narrated by Burl Ives, was produced and remains a constant holiday favorite to this day.

May quit his job in 1951 and spent the next seven years managing his creation. He then returned Montgomery Ward, where he worked until his retirement in 1971. May died in 1976, comfortable in the life that his misfit reindeer character had provided for him.

Although the story of Rudolph is best-known through the lyrics of Marks' song, May's initial rendition of the tale differs substantially in many ways. The original Rudolph was not one of Santa's reindeers nor was he the offspring of any of Santa's reindeers. Rudolph did not dwell at the North Pole but rather lived elswhere in an "ordinary" reindeer village. Although in May's story Rudolph was taunted and ridiculed for his shiny, red nose, he was not considered by his parents as a shameful embarrassment. Rudolph was raised in a loving reindeer household and was a responsible little fellow with a good self-image and sense of worth.

In addition, the original Rudolph did not rise to fame when Santa singled him out from the rest of the reindeer herd because of his shiny, red nose. Rudolph was discovered quite by accident when Santa noticed the glow emanating from Rudolph's room while the kindly old gift-giver was delivering presents to Rudolph's house. Concerned that the thickening fog...already the cause of several accidents and delays...would keep him from completing his Christmas Eve deliveries, Santa called upon Rudolph to lead the team of reindeer, observing upon their safe return:

"By YOU last night's journey was actually bossed.
Without you, I'm certain we'd all have been lost!"

The Team

The eight named reindeer of Santa Claus first appeared in American literature in 1823, featured in the famous poem penned by Clement Clarke Moore entitled, 'Twas the Night Before Christmas, also known as A Visit from Saint Nicholas. Prior to the appearance of this rhyme, legend had the jolly toy-bringer's sleigh pulled by one singular anonymous reindeer. By virtue of Moore's poem, Santa was gifted with eight reindeer: Dasher; Dancer; Prancer; Vixen; Comet; Cupid; Donder; and Blitzen. Unfortunately, for Donder, however, this particular reindeer is not always given the recognition so well-deserved, frequently being referred to as "Donner."

The Donder v. Donner Controversy

Confusion over the name of one of Santa's reindeer has been present from the inception of Moore's poem. The first published version appeared in the New York "Troy Sentinel" in 1823 and contained a typographical error that listed a reindeer by the name of "Dunder." However, when the poem reappeared in a collection of Moore's poetry in 1844, the name given in the text was "Donder." Furthermore, Moore's own introduction to the collection indicated that "Donder" was indeed the correct spelling he had intended. In addition, in a longhand version of the poem written by Moore the year prior to his death, he again rendered the name of "Donder."

Part of the "Donder/Donner" confusion is that "Blitzen" (the reindeer with whom Donder is generally paired) takes its name from the German word for "lightning," and the German word for "thunder" is "Donner." ("Donder" means "thunder" in Dutch, but it is unknown whether Moore actually made this connection or whether it is merely a conincidence.) However, the true culprit in the perpetuation of this error appears to be the song, "Rudolph, the Red-Nosed Reindeer" (details of which are given above). When this song was recorded by Gene Autry in 1949, the name of "Donder" had been transformed by Johnny Marks, the lyricist, into "Donner." The reasoning for this is not known. Marks was not reflecting a popular usage, since any reference to "Donner" being the name of one of Santa's reindeer did not appear in print prior to 1950. There has been speculation that the name change simply made the words flow more smoothly.

"Donner" was used again in 1948 with the release of Spike Jones' "All I Want For Christmas Is My Two Front Teeth," but in his 1996 television movie starring Angela Lansbury called "Mrs. Santa Claus," author Mark Saltzman correctly named the eight reindeer in accordance with Moore's intentions. Roland McElroy also used the correct name in his Christmas tale, "The Great Mizzariddle," as did Charles and Debra Ghigna in their book of Christmas poems entitled, "Christmas is Coming!"

With time, awareness and a little luck, perhaps Donder can once again be restored to the former glory of being known universally as a member of Santa's original Reindeer Team and the imposter known as "Donner" be laid to rest forever.

PrintPrint EmailEmail

Why reindeer don't fly


 

'Twas the night before Christmas, and all through the house ... there was animated debate regarding the flying ability of an animal that stands up to 1.4m high at the shoulder, measures up to 2.2m in length, and weighs up to 318kg, not to mention that it has no wings, and carries antlers that weigh up to 30kg! Karen Pearce discovers just why reindeers don't fly.


 

linebreak


reindeer'
Reindeer antlers can weigh up to 30kg. Image: Reuters

Since Clement Clarke Moore's seminal Christmas verse was published in 1823, people have strained their ears every Christmas Eve to hear if not the clatter, at least the patter of reindeer hooves on their rooftops. Unfortunately, we've been straining our ears in vain - short of invoking a little bit of seasonal magic, reindeer don't fly.


 

Reindeer don't fly because they do not have the physical apparatus necessary to facilitate such a feat. Apart from the lucky team of eight (nine if you count Rudolph), there has been no need over the aeons for reindeer to evolve features that would allow them to take to the air. In fact, relatively few vertebrates evolved the necessary features for true flight (although there are a number that glide from place to place). Only three taxa - pterosaurs, bats and birds - ever evolved the ability for powered flight.


 

linebreak


 

Up, up and away...


 

Pterosaurs were flying reptiles that took to the skies during the Jurassic and Cretaceous periods. Although long extinct, we know from the fossil record that the first vertebrates to fly under their own steam had a large wing membrane that extended from their body to a hugely elongated fourth finger on their forelimbs. From what we can tell, this wing would have been incredibly difficult to manipulate, and subject to significant damage from rips and tears in the membrane. Still, pterosaurs were able to persist for around 140 million years.


Bat's have developed many modifications for flight, including mebranous wings. Image: Reuters

Bats are the only mammals to have developed the ability for sustainable flight, and are the most recent taxon to take to the air. Their membranous wings are "reinforced" by four of their five fingers, but bats, like pterosaurs, could run into difficulties if they sustain a tear in the membrane. In addition to the development of their wing structure, the predominantly nocturnal bats exhibit a number of other modifications for flight, including echolocation and well developed senses.


 

By far the most highly evolved flying machines are the Birds. Over the course of 150 million years of evolutionary history birds have become light, efficient, aerodynamic packages that have been able to successfully exploit a range of environmental niches that were previously unavailable to vertebrates. Birds exhibit a range of modifications that are solely geared to getting them off the ground.


 

The most apparent is the modification of the forelimb into a wing. Not only has this involved some serious skeletal rearrangement over time, but also the development of musculature capable of working the wing. This has, in turn, been responsible for a number of other modifications that have taken place in the avian skeleton.


 

The sternum in birds has a highly developed keel, for the flight muscles to attach to. (Not surprisingly, this modification is absent in the Ratites - the group of flightless birds that includes the emu, ostrich, cassowary, rhea and kiwi). Also, many bones in the avian skeleton have been fused together. The collarbone in birds (the furcula or "wishbone") is fused to serve as a brace during flight, as are the thoracic vertebrae. The lower vertebrae are also generally fused into an elongated structure that supports the pelvic girdle. The bones themselves have also undergone some serious modification to make them lightweight. They are predominantly hollow, with a thin, lattice-like structure inside them to provide the necessary strength.
Feathers fly


Feathers are a key to the success of birds' ability to fly. Image: Reuters

Another obvious modification that has allowed birds to fly is the substitution of feathers for hair and scales. Made from keratin, the same material as hair and fingernails, feathers are a key to the success of birds' ability to fly. Unlike the membranous wings of pterosaurs and bats, the birds' flight surface is made up of hundreds of individually replaceable units. Should one feather become damaged, it can be easily replaced, and the integrity of the flight surface is not compromised.


 

Feathers come in a number of forms, depending on their function. Contour feathers are the stiff feathers that cover most of a bird's body, protecting the bird and streamlining it for flight. From the central shaft of these feathers extend vanes which branch into barbs. The barbs branch further into barbules, which have hooks on them that latch onto other hooks on neighbouring barbules.


 

This has the effect of forming a single, strong surface suitable for flight. Should any of the barbules unhook, the bird can re-hook them by preening. Flight feathers are longer and stiffer than contour feathers and are anchored to the bone by connective tissue on the wing and the tail. Downy feathers are soft, fluffy feathers that provide insulation. They do not have the hook structures present on flight and contour feathers.


 

Birds have also developed a unique respiratory system that not only facilitates gas exchange, but that acts as a sink for the considerable amount of heat dissipated by the metabolism of the flight muscles and makes the bird less dense, again making it lighter for flight. The key structures that make this possible are a number of air sacs that exist in addition to lungs.


 

The air sacs themselves do not serve in gas exchange, but act as a type of bellows that keep air flowing unidirectionally through the lungs. This system requires two inhalation/exhalation cycles for one "breath" to complete a full circuit. On the first inhalation, air is drawn through to the posterior air sacs. On the first exhalation this air is drawn from the posterior air sacs to the lungs. On the second inhalation it travels from the lungs to the anterior air sacs before finally being expelled from the body on the second exhalation. This system provides a more efficient system of gas exchange than the mammalian lung as the air passing across the diffusion surfaces in the lung is always fully oxygenated.


 

Another way that birds have been modified for flight is the loss of structures that are not absolutely necessary, to lighten the load that the bird has to carry, as well as to make them energetically more efficient. Most male birds, for example, do not have a penis and females have only one ovary. Birds don't posses sweat glands, nor do they have a diaphragm. The heavy tail of other animals has been replaced by feathers in birds, and the teeth laden jaw and associated musculature has been replaced by a light, horny beak.


 

linebreak
Why won't you guide my sleigh tonight?


Reindeer have been domesticated by humans for the last 5000 or so years. Image: Reuters

Reindeer, on the other hand, have not developed any of these flight-specific characteristics over time. Instead (and quite sensibly) they have evolved features that make them more suited to life in the arctic and subarctic climes where they reside. While these features mean that reindeer are at home in the upper latitudes, they are nowhere near being equipped for the upper atmosphere.


 

Their highly developed sense of smell is one such adaptation. Although their vision and hearing is not the best, reindeer have a keen sense of smell which is useful for picking up any scent of danger and for finding lichen, their staple diet, under snow cover.


 

Reindeer feet are also highly specialised. Their hooves are large and circular, and are effective tools for scraping snow from lichen. Because of their large size, the hooves act as kind of snowshoes in winter, preventing the reindeer from sinking into the snow. They are also effective paddles when the reindeer swim. Reindeer have large, soft foot pads in summer, but in winter these pads shrink up, and hair between the toes forms tufts that cover them. This serves to protect the fleshy parts of the feet when the reindeer walk on ice and snow.


 

The reindeer coat is another specialised feature. Over the woolly undercoat, which keeps the reindeer warm, is a second coat made of hollow, air-filled hairs. The air trapped in this outer coat offers additional insulation, and also provides buoyancy when the reindeer swim. It is so effective in this respect that only the lower two-thirds of the reindeer are submerged when it swims.


 

Reindeer have been domesticated by humans for the last 5000 or so years, and have been bred to enhance characteristics that improve their ability to pull sleds (on the ground!) or provide milk, fur and meat, none of which is really conducive to flight. Even reindeer in the wild are too far down the evolutionary path to being ground-dwellers at the top of the world to change tactics and take to the air, and it is incredibly unlikely that the selection pressures operating on the reindeer would drive them in that direction.


 

Of course, all of this ignores the fact that Santa Claus is potentially the greatest scientist the world has ever known. With his abilities to cross the boundaries of space and time, delivering presents to millions of children all over the world in the space of a single evening, I'm sure that this minor biological issue is of little concern to him. I have to go now - I think I hear sleigh bells overhead...


 

 

"Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer" is perhaps the most modern of all Christmas symbols and certainly the most familiar of Reindeer, even though he was not a member of Santa's original team. Created in 1939 by a 34-year old copywriter named Robert L. May, Rudolph was the product of a request made by May's employer, Montgomery Ward, which wanted a Christmas story it could use as a promotional tool for its chain of department stores. The Chicago-based company had been buying and distributing coloring books for children at Christmas for many years and the idea of creating a giveaway booklet of its own was perceived to be an excellent means of saving money. May, who had a penchant for writing children's stories and limericks, was called upon to create the booklet.
Originally in poetry form, May composed the tale about a misfit reindeer by drawing, in part, upon "The Ugly Duckling" concept and May's own childhood experience of being subjected to frequent taunting due to his small, slight stature and his tendency toward shyness. Thus, May settled upon the idea of an underdog who is ostracized by the rest of the reindeer community because of his physical abnormality...a glowing red nose. In search of an alliterative name for his misfit, May considered and rejected "Rollo" as being too cheerful and carefree. He also rejected "Reginald," feeling it to be too British in nature, before finally deciding upon "Rudolph."
The story was written as a series of rhyming couplets which May tested on his 4-year old daughter Barbara as he went along. Barbara was delighted with the story, but May's employer feared that a tale featuring a red nose...an image usually associated with drinking and drunkards...might prove unsuitable for a Christmas story. May responded by taking Denver Gillen, a friend from Montgomery Ward's art department, to the Lincoln Park Zoo in order that Gillen could sketch some deer. Gillen's illustrations of a red-nosed reindeer overcame the hesistancy of May's employer and the Rudolph story was approved. That first year (1939), Montgomery Ward distributed 2.4 million copies of May's booklet, and although the wartime paper shortage curtailed printing for the following several years, a grand total of 6 million copies had been given to children by the end of 1946.
The post-war demand for licensing the Rudolph character was enormous but, since May had created the tale as an employee of Montgomery Ward, the company had possession of the copyright and May received no royalties. Deeply in debt due to the medical bills resulting from his wife's terminal illness (she passed away around the time Rudolph was created), May persuaded his employer's Corporate President, Sewell Avery, to turn over the copyright to him in January of 1947. With the rights to his creation in hand, May's financial security was assured.
Later that year, "Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer" was printed commercially and, in 1948, was shown in theaters as a 9-minute cartoon. The Rudolph phenomenon really caught on, however, when Johnny Marks, May's brother-in-law and songwriter, penned the lyrics and melody for a Rudolph song. This musical version of Rudolph's tale was recorded by Gene Autry in 1949. It sold two million copies during its first year and went on to become one of the best-selling songs of all time...second only to "White Christmas." In 1964, an American television special about Rudolph, narrated by Burl Ives, was produced and remains a constant holiday favorite to this day.
May quit his job in 1951 and spent the next seven years managing his creation. He then returned Montgomery Ward, where he worked until his retirement in 1971. May died in 1976, comfortable in the life that his misfit reindeer character had provided for him.
Although the story of Rudolph is best-known through the lyrics of Marks' song, May's initial rendition of the tale differs substantially in many ways. The original Rudolph was not one of Santa's reindeers nor was he the offspring of any of Santa's reindeers. Rudolph did not dwell at the North Pole but rather lived elswhere in an "ordinary" reindeer village. Although in May's story Rudolph was taunted and ridiculed for his shiny, red nose, he was not considered by his parents as a shameful embarrassment. Rudolph was raised in a loving reindeer household and was a responsible little fellow with a good self-image and sense of worth.
In addition, the original Rudolph did not rise to fame when Santa singled him out from the rest of the reindeer herd because of his shiny, red nose. Rudolph was discovered quite by accident when Santa noticed the glow emanating from Rudolph's room while the kindly old gift-giver was delivering presents to Rudolph's house. Concerned that the thickening fog...already the cause of several accidents and delays...would keep him from completing his Christmas Eve deliveries, Santa called upon Rudolph to lead the team of reindeer, observing upon their safe return:
"By YOU last night's journey was actually bossed.
Without you, I'm certain we'd all have been lost!"
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MASCOT - Antlers  / The Science

MASCOT - Antlers / In Medicine
 

MASCOT - ANTLERS  Management / Reproduction / Taxidermy
 
Management
 
Reproduction
 
Taxidermy

MASCOT - Antlers - Other Famous Places Named

MASCOT - DARTMOUTH
 

MASCOT - KEGGY / Dartmouth
 

MASCOT - INDIAN
 

MASCOT - GENERAL
 

 
 

 
 

MASCOT - Antlers  / The Science

MASCOT - Antlers / In Medicine
 

MASCOT - ANTLERS  Management / Reproduction / Taxidermy
 
Management
 
Reproduction
 
Taxidermy

MASCOT - Antlers - Other Famous Places Named

MASCOT - DARTMOUTH
 

MASCOT - KEGGY / Dartmouth
 

MASCOT - INDIAN
 

MASCOT - GENERAL
 

MASCOT- Reindeer